Workplace Bullying in Healthcare and the Leadership Response
Healthcare is one of the most demanding professional environments on earth. Clinicians make high-stakes decisions under pressure, routinely absorb the grief and trauma of others, and operate within systems stretched well beyond capacity. Most enter the profession with a commitment to care. What many do not expect is that one of the greatest threats to their wellbeing will come not from patients, but from colleagues and institutions.
Workplace bullying in healthcare is a crisis. It is endemic, structurally reinforced, and damaging at scale — to individuals, to teams, and ultimately to the patients those teams exist to serve. The sector can no longer treat it as an uncomfortable outlier. The data demand a different response.
The Scale of the Problem
In Australia, healthcare and social assistance recorded the highest number of serious workers’ compensation claims among all industries in 2021–22, accounting for 18.9% of all serious claims.[1] A World Health Organization multi-site study found that up to 67% of Australian healthcare workers reported verbal abuse in a single year — the highest rate among the countries surveyed.[2]
A Monash University survey of nursing and midwifery federation members found nearly 50% had experienced bullying or harassment within the previous twelve months.[3] A multi-facility study found that over 85% of nursing staff had observed workplace bullying, and more than a third had been direct victims.[4] A systematic review of radiology workers found 100% had experienced verbal aggression.[5]
Among medical trainees, the Australian Medical Training Survey — administered annually by the Medical Board of Australia and AHPRA — found that 35% of junior doctors witnessed or experienced bullying, harassment, or discrimination in 2021, up from 34% in 2020 and 33% in 2019.[6] The problem is considerably worse for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander trainees, with 52% experiencing or witnessing these behaviours compared with 35% of junior doctors overall.[6]
The financial toll compounds the human one. The Australian Productivity Commission estimated the total cost of workplace bullying to the national economy at between $6 billion and $36 billion annually.[7] At the individual level, research puts the cost per victim at up to $100,000 per year when absenteeism, lost productivity, turnover, and clinical error are factored in.[7]
How Bullying Manifests in Healthcare Settings
Workplace bullying in healthcare rarely presents as a single dramatic incident. It accumulates. Common forms include persistent public humiliation of junior staff, aggressive questioning during clinical training — sometimes euphemistically described as ‘teaching by pressure’ — social exclusion from decision-making, withholding of information that affects performance, and what researchers describe as ‘undermining behaviours’: subtle, deniable, but corrosive over time.[8]
Surgical and acute care settings carry particular risk. In 2015, the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons commissioned an independent review that found 49% of surgeons and trainees had experienced discrimination, bullying, or sexual harassment, and that 71% of hospitals reported these behaviours among staff, with senior surgeons identified as the primary perpetrators.[9]
A 2024 study published in The Lancet Regional Health — Western Pacific identified that fragmented regulation, weak correction processes, conflicts of interest, and fear of retribution for complainants collectively create environments that enable perpetrators while discouraging reporting.[10] The targets are not random. Research consistently identifies women, new employees, individuals with disabilities, and those from marginalised communities as disproportionately affected.[4,8]
What the Research Actually Shows About Impact
The consequences of workplace bullying extend well beyond the individual who experiences it — making it a patient safety issue, not merely an HR one. A simulation study found that teams subjected to even mild rudeness shared less information, sought help less often, and produced poorer clinical outcomes for patients.[11] Incivility alone — below any threshold we might call bullying — degraded team performance in measurable, patient-facing ways.[11]
The mechanism is psychological safety. Amy Edmondson’s foundational research defines psychological safety as a shared belief that team members can speak up, take risks, and admit mistakes without fear of punishment or humiliation.[12] In healthcare, this is not merely a team dynamic preference — it is a clinical competency. Research confirms that when leader inclusiveness supports psychological safety, nurses are less likely to remain silent and more likely to report errors.[13] Bullying cultures suppress exactly the voices most likely to catch the mistakes that harm patients.
Beyond patient safety, bullying drives attrition in a sector that cannot afford it. More than half of nurses who experienced workplace violence seriously considered leaving their role or the profession as a direct result.[14] Workplace bullying is closely linked to intention to leave, increased absenteeism, reduced job satisfaction, and deteriorating team relationships — all compounding existing workforce pressures.[4,8]
Why the System Enables It
One of the most important shifts in how researchers now frame workplace bullying in healthcare is the move from individual attribution to systemic analysis. A 2025 paper in Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research is direct: bullying in healthcare is increasingly recognised as a symptom of systemic dysfunction rather than isolated misconduct.[15] The enabling factors are structural — inadequate governance, poor detection and correction mechanisms, conflicts of interest that protect perpetrators, and cultural norms that frame silence as professionalism and reporting as disloyalty.[10]
The National Health Practitioner Ombudsman’s 2023 report, Processes for Progress, recommended that the Australian Medical Council work with colleges and stakeholders to develop a clear framework for managing bullying, harassment, racism, and discrimination at accredited specialist training sites — with defined roles, responsibilities, and accountability mechanisms.[16]
The system’s response, when it comes, is frequently insufficient. Of junior doctors who experienced or witnessed bullying, 66–70% did not report it.[10] Among nurses, only 47% who experienced violence reported it to management — citing time constraints, insufficient staffing, and perceived inaction.[4] The 2017 AHPRA-commissioned report found that concerns about vexatious complaints are largely unfounded: no more than 1% of health sector complaints are estimated to be vexatious.[10]
In my work coaching healthcare leaders and professionals, I see this pattern consistently. Those presenting for coaching after sustained workplace bullying are rarely clinical outliers — they are often among the most committed practitioners in their organisation, whose values make them unwilling simply to absorb the culture and move on. The cost of that refusal, and the resilience required to navigate it, is significant.
The Regulatory Landscape Has Changed
A development that deserves greater attention in healthcare settings is the transformation of Australia’s work health and safety framework. Safe Work Australia’s revised model WHS Regulations and the accompanying Code of Practice: Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work (2022) now impose a positive duty on employers to proactively identify and manage psychosocial risks — including bullying — rather than respond reactively.[17]
As of 2024, nearly every Australian state and territory has adopted these changes. NSW went further still: the Work Health and Safety Regulation 2025 now explicitly requires application of the hierarchy of controls to psychosocial risks, including mandatory elimination where reasonably practicable.[18,19] This is not soft law. A Victorian employer was fined close to $380,000 in late 2023 for failing to identify or assess psychosocial risk adequately.[18]
Healthcare organisations that treat bullying solely as a conduct or HR matter are not only failing their people — under current Australian law, they are increasingly exposed to serious regulatory risk.
A Leadership Framework for Response
Given the evidence, what does effective organisational response actually look like? Three overlapping areas demand attention: detection, culture, and leadership development.
Detection requires more than policy — it requires systems that staff trust enough to use. Initiatives such as the Ethos programme evaluated across St Vincent’s Hospitals in Australia represent the kind of structural intervention the evidence supports: confidential, accessible, and genuinely acted upon.[20]
Culture change requires leaders who understand that psychological safety is a performance lever, not a soft concept. Teams with high psychological safety report errors more frequently, allow for earlier intervention, and produce better clinical outcomes.[12,13] Building that safety requires leaders who model vulnerability, reward candour, and respond visibly to concerns.
The four stages of psychological safety framework — inclusion, learner, contributor, and challenger safety — offers healthcare leaders a practical progression for building environments where speaking up is genuinely possible.[21] This is a culture project, not a workshop. It requires time, visible senior support, and institutional commitment.
The AMA’s updated Position Statement and its 2022 campaign calling on hospital boards to act directly reinforces this: role modelling from senior clinical leaders is the single most cited lever for cultural change in the research literature.[22]
The Resilience Dimension
It would be a mistake to frame this issue solely as an organisational problem requiring organisational solutions. The individuals caught within bullying cultures need support that is timely, skilled, and genuine — not a referral to an EAP hotline.
Resilience in this context is not about absorbing more. Properly understood, it is the capacity to navigate adversity without losing the ability to function effectively, maintain connection, and act in accordance with one’s values. For healthcare professionals experiencing or recovering from workplace bullying, that involves processing the psychological impact, rebuilding confidence in professional identity, and determining whether the organisation they are in is capable of changing — or whether their energy is better directed elsewhere.
These conversations require skilled, confidential, independent support. For many healthcare professionals, professional coaching outside the institution provides exactly that space.
What Needs to Change
The evidence on workplace bullying in healthcare is not new. What is new is the growing consensus that framing it as an individual conduct issue has failed. Meaningful change requires:
- Governance reform that closes the regulatory gaps enabling perpetrators to avoid accountability[10,16]
- Reporting mechanisms that staff actually trust, with visible institutional follow-through — including compliance with Safe Work Australia’s psychosocial hazards framework[17,18]
- Leadership development that treats psychological safety as a clinical competency, not a compliance checkbox[12,21]
- Independent support for affected practitioners that goes beyond reactive EAP referrals
- Annual public reporting by specialty colleges on bullying complaints and sanctions imposed, as recommended by the Senate Community Affairs Committee[23]
Healthcare organisations that fail to address bullying are not simply failing their staff. They are compromising patient safety, driving workforce attrition, and — under Australia’s current WHS laws — taking on significant legal exposure. The evidence is clear. The question is whether leadership has the will to act on it.
Author Bio

Andrew Healey, MBA, Resilience and Leadership Coach, Prospice Consulting
Andrew Healey is a Resilience and Leadership Coach based in Newcastle, NSW, operating through Prospice Consulting. He works with founders, executives, clinicians, and senior leaders across Australia, with a focus on resilience, leadership under pressure, and building psychologically safe team cultures. Credentials include an MBA from Strathclyde Business School, R2 Resilience Expert, PR6 Resilience Practitioner, Solution Focused Brief Therapy (Diamond Level 1), and Authorised Partner with Coaching On the Go (Henley Business School).
References:
- Safe Work Australia / Healthdirect Australia (2022). Healthcare and social assistance: serious workers' compensation claims 2021–22. Retrieved from healthdirect.gov.au/workplace-bullying
- World Health Organization multi-site study on verbal abuse in healthcare. Cited in: Abdulkarim, S.M. & Subke, A.A. (2023). Cureus, 15(7). DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41382
- Monash University / Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (Victoria) (2015). Leading indicators of occupational health and safety: survey of ANMF (Vic branch) members. Cited in: Victorian Auditor-General's Office (2016). Bullying and Harassment in the Health Sector. Melbourne: VAGO.
- Victorian Auditor-General's Office (2016). Bullying and Harassment in the Health Sector. Melbourne: VAGO. Retrieved from audit.vic.gov.au
- Busch, I.M. et al. (2023). Systematic review of verbal aggression and violence against radiology workers. Cited in: ScienceDirect — Silent Struggles: Workplace Bullying in Healthcare (PIIS1546084324001263).
- Medical Board of Australia / AHPRA. Medical Training Survey 2021. Cited in: AMA Media Release, 7 February 2022. Retrieved from ama.com.au and sbs.com.au/news [AMA survey junior doctors bullying 2022]
- Australian Productivity Commission (2010). The cost of workplace bullying: $6–$36 billion annually. Cited in: VAGO (2016). Individual cost per victim up to $100,000 per year.
- Aunger, J.A. et al. (2023). Drivers of unprofessional behaviour between staff in acute care hospitals: A realist review. BMC Health Services Research, 23.
- Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (2015). Expert Advisory Group Report on discrimination, bullying and sexual harassment. RACS. Retrieved from surgeons.org
- Haskell, T.L., Stankovich, J., & Merridew, N.L. (2024). A new framework for Australian specialty colleges and other healthcare leaders to address bullying, discrimination, and harassment that involves doctors. The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, 48, 101118. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101118
- Simulation study on rudeness and clinical team performance. Cited in: Westbrook, J.I. et al. (2025). Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 25(4), 635–638. DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2460518
- Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
- Alingh, C.W. et al. (2019). Psychological safety as a mediator of the relationship between inclusive leadership and nurse voice behaviours and error reporting. Journal of Nursing Management. PMC9292620.
- Hennepin Healthcare / Peaceful Leaders Academy (2022). Nurses, violence, and workforce impact — over half considered leaving. Cited in: Workplace Violence in Healthcare Statistics (2024). peacefulleadersacademy.com
- Westbrook, J.I. et al. (2025). How unprofessional behaviours between healthcare staff threaten patient care and safety. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 25(4), 635–638. DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2460518
- National Health Practitioner Ombudsman (2023). Processes for Progress Part One: A Roadmap for Greater Transparency and Accountability in Specialist Medical Training Site Accreditation. October 2023. Retrieved from abetterculture.org.au/news-resources
- Safe Work Australia (2022). Model Code of Practice: Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from safeworkaustralia.gov.au/doc/model-code-practice-managing-psychosocial-hazards-work
- HFW Lawyers (2024). Australia: Addressing Psychosocial Hazards in the Workplace. Retrieved from hfw.com. Citing: Work Health and Safety Amendment (Managing Psychosocial Risk) Regulations 2022; Victorian employer fined ~$380,000 (late 2023).
- SafeWork NSW (2025). Code of Practice: Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work — Work Health and Safety Regulation 2025 hierarchy of controls. Retrieved from safework.nsw.gov.au
- Westbrook, J.I. et al. (2024). Evaluation of a culture change program to reduce unprofessional behaviours by hospital co-workers in Australian hospitals [Ethos programme, St Vincent's]. BMC Health Services Research, 24, 722.
- Clark, T.R. (2020). The 4 Stages of Psychological Safety: Defining the Path to Inclusion and Innovation. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
- Australian Medical Association (2022). AMA pushes for hospital boards to combat bullying. Media release, 27 May 2022. Retrieved from ama.com.au/media/ama-pushes-hospital-boards-combat-bullying
- Australian Senate Community Affairs Committee. Medical complaints process inquiry — Recommendation 5: annual public reporting by specialty colleges on bullying and harassment complaints and sanctions. Commonwealth Parliament. Retrieved from aph.gov.au
APPENDICES
Key Australian Reports and Regulatory Initiatives on Workplace Bullying in Healthcare
Compiled by Andrew Healey | Prospice Consulting
Appendix A: Key Australian Reports
A1. Medical Training Survey — Medical Board of Australia / AHPRA (Annual)
Australia's most significant ongoing data source on trainee wellbeing and workplace culture in medicine. Administered annually across all specialty training programmes. The 2021 survey found that 35% of junior doctors witnessed or experienced bullying, harassment, or discrimination — up from 34% in 2020 and 33% in 2019. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander trainees were disproportionately affected at 52%. Of those exposed, 66–70% who experienced it and 75–78% who witnessed it did not report it. The survey provides year-on-year trend data enabling colleges and employers to track whether interventions are producing measurable change.
Source: ama.com.au | medicalboard.gov.au | ahpra.gov.au
A2. RACS Expert Advisory Group Report on Discrimination, Bullying and Sexual Harassment (2015)
A landmark independent review commissioned by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons following sustained advocacy by surgical trainees. Found that 49% of surgeons and trainees had experienced discrimination, bullying, or sexual harassment, and that 71% of hospitals reported these behaviours among staff, with senior surgeons identified as the primary perpetrators. The College issued a formal apology and committed to a Building Respect, Improving Patient Safety Action Plan. The report is widely credited with triggering sector-wide attention to the issue across Australian specialty colleges.
Source: surgeons.org/media/22175315/report_of_the_expert_advisory_group.pdf
A3. Victorian Auditor-General's Office — Bullying and Harassment in the Health Sector (2016)
A formal performance audit of how Victorian public health services manage bullying and harassment. Found systemic failures in prevention, detection, and response — including absence of consistent policy, inadequate training for managers, and insufficient data collection to enable accountability. The audit drew on the Monash University / ANMF Victoria survey data showing nearly 50% of nursing staff experienced bullying in the previous twelve months, and the Productivity Commission's estimate of $6–$36 billion in annual economic cost. Remains a foundational reference for Australian healthcare-specific bullying governance.
Source: audit.vic.gov.au/report/bullying-and-harassment-health-sector
A4. National Health Practitioner Ombudsman — Processes for Progress (October 2023)
The NHPO's first major report into accreditation and complaints handling across specialist medical training. Recommended that the Australian Medical Council work with colleges and stakeholders to develop a clear framework specifically for managing bullying, harassment, racism, and discrimination complaints at accredited training sites — including defined roles, responsibilities, timelines, and accountability mechanisms. A Better Culture (abetterculture.org.au) tracks implementation of these recommendations and publishes annual scorecards on college compliance.
Source: nhpo.gov.au | abetterculture.org.au/news-resources
A5. Haskell, Stankovich & Merridew — The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific (July 2024)
A peer-reviewed framework paper that analysed the policies of Australian specialty colleges against an evidence-based model for addressing bullying, discrimination, and harassment involving doctors. Identified fragmented regulation, conflicts of interest, weak detection and correction processes, and fear of retribution as the structural enablers. Proposed a five-element framework for reform: independent oversight, mandatory reporting mechanisms, protected disclosures, accessible support for complainants, and transparent annual reporting. Directly informed the NHPO's reform agenda.
Source: DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101118
A6. Australian Senate Community Affairs Committee — Medical Complaints Inquiry
A parliamentary inquiry into the handling of medical complaints, which explicitly addressed workplace bullying in clinical training. Recommendation 5 called on all specialist training colleges to publicly release annual reports detailing the number of bullying and harassment complaints received and the number of resulting sanctions. This transparency measure was designed to close the accountability gap that enables cultures of impunity in medical training environments.
Source: aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs
A7. Westbrook et al. — Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (2025)
A recent peer-reviewed paper examining how unprofessional behaviours between healthcare staff directly threaten patient care and safety. Synthesises the clinical and economic evidence base, including simulation research demonstrating that mild rudeness alone — below the threshold of bullying — measurably degrades team information-sharing and clinical outcomes. Frames unprofessional behaviour as a systemic patient safety issue requiring systemic response, not individual conduct management.
Source: DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2460518
Appendix B: Key Australian Regulatory Initiatives
B1. Safe Work Australia — Model Code of Practice: Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work (2022)
The most significant national regulatory development in this space. The revised model Work Health and Safety Regulations introduced a positive duty on employers to proactively identify, assess, and manage psychosocial hazards — including workplace bullying — rather than respond reactively to complaints. The accompanying Code of Practice provides practical guidance on risk assessment, controls, and consultation obligations. As of 2024, nearly every Australian state and territory has adopted the model regulations, making proactive psychosocial risk management a legal obligation across the healthcare sector. This fundamentally reframes bullying from a conduct matter to a workplace safety matter.
Source: safeworkaustralia.gov.au/doc/model-code-practice-managing-psychosocial-hazards-work
B2. NSW Work Health and Safety Regulation 2025 — Psychosocial Risk Hierarchy of Controls
New South Wales has implemented among the most stringent psychosocial risk requirements in Australia. The WHS Regulation 2025 explicitly requires employers to apply the hierarchy of controls to psychosocial risks, mandating elimination of such risks where reasonably practicable. This goes beyond the model code in requiring documented risk assessments and demonstrable control hierarchies — not merely policies. Healthcare employers in NSW operating without a structured psychosocial risk management framework are directly exposed under this regulation.
Source: safework.nsw.gov.au/law-and-policy/acts-regulations-codes-of-practice/codes-of-practice
B3. Victorian Employer Prosecution — Psychosocial Risk Failure (Late 2023)
A Victorian employer was fined approximately $380,000 in late 2023 for failing to adequately identify or assess psychosocial risk in the workplace. This prosecution signals that regulators are prepared to enforce the positive duty created by the 2022 framework — and that the consequences of non-compliance are material. For healthcare organisations, this precedent is particularly relevant: the sector's documented exposure to psychosocial risk is well established in the published literature, making the 'we didn't know' defence increasingly untenable.
Source: HFW Lawyers (2024). Australia: Addressing Psychosocial Hazards in the Workplace. hfw.com
B4. The Ethos Programme — St Vincent's Hospitals Australia
One of the few Australian hospital-level interventions subject to formal research evaluation. Ethos is a confidential electronic reporting system enabling staff to speak up when they observe or experience unprofessional behaviour, without requiring formal complaint. Evaluated by Westbrook et al. in BMC Health Services Research (2024) across multiple St Vincent's sites, assessing both cultural outcomes and clinical impact. The programme represents the detection-first model the evidence supports: accessible, anonymous, and designed to surface patterns rather than manage individual incidents in isolation.
Source: Westbrook, J.I. et al. (2024). BMC Health Services Research, 24, 722. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11135-y
B5. Australian Medical Association — Position Statement and Hospital Boards Campaign (2022)
The AMA reaffirmed its zero-tolerance position on workplace bullying and launched a targeted campaign calling on hospital boards — not just clinical managers — to take direct accountability for cultural change. The AMA Council of Doctors in Training emphasised that patient safety is directly impaired when practitioners work in environments where speaking up is not safe, and that meaningful cultural change requires visible senior role modelling rather than policy-level commitment alone. The campaign represented a deliberate escalation from HR-level to board-level accountability framing.
Source: ama.com.au/media/ama-pushes-hospital-boards-combat-bullying (27 May 2022)
B6. A Better Culture (abetterculture.org.au)
An Australian advocacy and resource organisation specifically focused on bullying and discrimination in medicine and specialist training. A Better Culture tracks implementation of NHPO recommendations, publishes updates on college compliance, and provides resources for trainees and clinicians navigating complaints processes. It serves as the primary independent monitoring body for reform commitments made by specialty colleges and the Australian Medical Council following the NHPO's 2023 report.
Source: abetterculture.org.au
Note on Currency
Regulatory requirements in this area are evolving rapidly. Readers are advised to verify current state and territory WHS legislation directly with Safe Work Australia (safeworkaustralia.gov.au) and the relevant jurisdictional regulator. This appendix reflects the position as of May 2026.